Solutions

DeafKidz Defenders

The DeafKidz Defenders program uses a play-based EdTech resource with thematic minigames and scenarios to increase children’s ability to recognize and respond to online and offline abuse. 

This program is implemented by DeafKidz International|Deaf Reach, Pakistan | Thrive , South Africa
Deafkidz defenders hero image
1

Quick facts and key themes

Selective prevention interventions are sometimes adapted to meet the specific needs of children with disabilities. These engage children who have diverse learning needs and communication challenges. This is a group of children who may be at heightened risk of sexual violence.

Effectiveness of intervention type

Prudent

INSPIRE pillar

Education and life skills

Evidence type

Mixed-methods pre-post evaluation

Children from marginalised and discriminated populations experience distinct lived realities and challenges that conventional, evidence-based frameworks often struggle to adequately address. These include children who are Black, children with disabilities, LGBTQ+ children, children belonging to ethnic or religious minorities and those in institutions, deprived of liberty or in conflict with the law. Many of these children are also considered to be at increased risk for childhood sexual violence. 

Frontline practitioners and those with lived expertise have long been developing approaches grounded in direct experience. Valuing practice-based knowledge brings these insights into view, helping shape more inclusive, disability-aware strategies for prevention and support.

What these case studies show 

These case studies illustrate how practice-based knowledge (PbK) is used in real world settings to improve childhood sexual violence prevention and response. Each case focuses on what practitioners or survivor-led groups learned through action, reflection, and decision-making in their own contexts, and how that knowledge was taken forward. 

What these case studies do and do not do 

The case studies do not aim to produce generalisable findings. Instead, they offer context-specific insight into how practice unfolds, where challenges emerge, and how actors respond in real time. The absence of evaluation or impact data should not be interpreted as evidence for or against effectiveness. 

How to use these insights in your own work 

These case studies are intended to support reflection rather than replication. Readers may find them useful for: 

  • identifying questions to explore within their own practice
  • recognising patterns or tensions that resonate with their own settings
  • anticipating practical, ethical, or institutional challenges before they arise 

Ethical use and limitations 

Documenting and sharing PbK requires careful attention to safety, consent, power, and potential harm, particularly when engaging with sensitive experiences of child sexual violence. The ethical principles guiding this work are set out in the PbK Guidance Framework 

Scope and limits of the knowledge shared 

Each case study reflects the type and depth of knowledge available within its context. Differences in format, detail, and focus reflect variation in purpose, access, and the conditions under which knowledge was documented and shared.  

Content warning  

Some of the case studies include details of childhood sexual violence. Each case study includes specific content notes to support informed engagement. Please take care of your well-being as you read and step away if needed. For additional support, you may find it helpful to consult the following resources:  

2

Context

Children living with disabilities are 3.7 more likely to experience violence and 3 times more likely to experience sexual violence compared with their peers [1]. For deaf children, the risk of sexual violence is 2-3 times higher than among hearing children [2]. Deaf leaders and frontline practitioners have long surfaced these realities behind the numbers, showing how stigma, prejudice, as well as the absence of safe and accessible channels for disclosure, make deaf children especially vulnerable.

The team’s lived and practice expertise highlight that despite this documented disparity, there are few accessible resources available for deaf children to learn about abuse and ways to protect themselves and seek help - especially in low-resource settings. Further barriers to learning include low literacy levels among deaf children, challenges with interpersonal communication, and lack of sign language literacy among wider society. All this leads to deaf children having reduced interpersonal safeguarding skills and not knowing how to disclose and get help when experiencing abuse and violence. 

Since schools play a dual role – as both a child’s main source of education and a site at which harm can occur – effective school-based interventions for children living with disabilities are critically needed.

3

About the program

DKD Img 3

Deaf students at a school in Pakistan play DeafKidz Defenders minigames. Credit: DeafKidz International

How practice-based knowledge shaped the program 

DeafKidz International (DKI) is a deaf-led organisation, founded by Steve Crump, who is deaf. DKI emerged from Crump’s learnings from working in conflict and post-conflict settings, combined with practitioner and lived expertise from deaf communities, which revealed widespread but largely invisible abuse faced by deaf children. Building on these insights, DKI developed DeafKidz Defenders.  

Practice and lived expertise from deaf teachers, frontline workers, digital specialists, and families highlighted that the reading levels of deaf children are often lower than those of their peers, and that they learn best through interactive, visual methods. Guided by this knowledge, the first prototype game focused on consent, recognising abuse, and empowering children to say no when something felt uncomfortable. Feedback from deaf children directly shaped its expansion into a broader set of mini-games that taught various protective behaviours.

 

What it is and how it works

The DeafKidz Defenders program uses a play-based EdTech resource with thematic minigames and scenarios to increase deaf and hard-of-hearing children’s ability to recognize and respond to online and offline abuse. Alongside this, deaf-specific safeguarding training is delivered to teachers, caregivers, and other key adults in the child’s life. Practice-based knowledge  – knowledge gained over years through the development of the programme – has guided key design choices, including the use of minimal text, visual play-based learning, and the inclusion of strong deaf role models as facilitators.  

DeafKidz Defenders was designed to be delivered in a school environment by DKI facilitators or teaching staff from the schools themselves in the children’s first language (national sign languages). Given the program’s sensitive content, delivery is done in a familiar environment with safeguarding protocols where children can safely discuss topics and have any possible disclosures handled appropriately.

Young deaf children are put at the heart of our story. ”

Teacher discussing DeafKidz Defenders
DKD Img 2

Deaf students, school staff, and DKI staff pose for a “Say No!” group photo in a school in South Africa. Credit: DeafKidz Defenders

Program evaluation and outcomes

DeafKidz Defenders was piloted across 10 schools in Pakistan (with 318 children ages 7 to 11), and South Africa (with 302 children ages 5 to 15) from May to September, 2022 through two partner organisations: Deaf Reach (Pakistan) and Thrive (South Africa).  

It also received a second external evaluation in 2025 by Southern Hemisphere, a South Africa based research agency. It evaluated rollouts in South Africa, Zambia, and Pakistan.  

Qualitative:

  • Session observations.
  • Focus group discussions and key informant interviews with children and teachers.

 Quantitative:

  • Pre- and post-program surveys to assess children’s knowledge of abuse and protective behaviors.
  • Pre- and post-program surveys to assess teachers’ knowledge of and confidence in child safeguarding, as well as the outcomes of the program in their classrooms.
  • Parent surveys.

Pre-program findings:

  • Children had little to no knowledge of what constitutes abuse or how to handle unsafe situations.
  • Teachers were worried about student safety and often handled disclosures, but only half had received some form of safeguarding training.
  • Parents felt confident in keeping their children safe but did not have knowledge of child safeguarding concepts.
Credit: DeafKidz Defenders

Credit: DeafKidz Defenders

The process has helped us create a bonding and network of informed and empowered community members. I feel included in a circle of care and my knowledge base to help support children has been strengthened. ”

Teacher discussing DeafKidz Defenders

91%

of children increased their ability to recognize abuse and respond with an appropriate protective behavior (saying no and telling a trusted adult).

56%

of children more than doubled their safeguarding knowledge assessment scores.

98%

of teachers felt more confident teaching children how to keep safe.

98%

of teachers felt more able to handle disclosures of abuse.

91%

of teachers said they would use DeafKidz Defenders in their classrooms again.

26%

of parents reported their children sharing a concern with them for the first time after completing DeafKidz Defenders.

4

Real world impact

DKD Img 1

Deaf students in South Africa receive DeafKidz Defenders, facilitated by a DeafKidz International staff member. Credit: DeafKidz Defenders

Over 90% of children participating in DeafKidz Defenders demonstrate an increased understanding of abuse and protective behaviors. One message that resonated particularly well with children was ‘say stop and find a trusted adult’. 

In addition, the program increases the actionable, deaf-specific safeguarding knowledge of teachers, parents, and professionals. 95% of teachers reported being better equipped to handle cases of abuse and teach deaf kids’ topics covered by DeafKidz Defenders. 

The evaluation showed that the innovative, blended approach of combining play-based digital learning with face-to-face facilitated activities was effective in helping most deaf children in the pilot schools improve their knowledge of abuse and protective behaviors. The program is particularly effective for children with lower language development, as they could learn more easily through visual, play-based elements. Children are 7 times more likely to speak out, say no, and get help.

Since 2022, DKI has expanded the programme to Zambia and Kenya. As of 2025, over 3000 deaf children have been reached across these 4 countries.

I believe in this work with all my heart. We are all, every adult in this world, responsible for the safety and wellbeing of children, including deaf children. Most deaf children live out their childhoods without having their fundamental rights upheld. The work is difficult and complex but we are here, and we will not tire of doing whatever we can to protect deaf children. ”

Debra Clelland, DeafKidz International CEO
Credit: DeafKidz Defenders

Credit: DeafKidz Defenders

5

Challenges and lessons learned

Challenges: 

  • Deaf children’s ability to recognize abuse in real life: This is due to limited socialization due to (relative) isolation, communicaiton barriers, and reduced incidental learning.
  • Barriers to learning: Without dedicated programs, the communication and learning barriers deaf children face hinder their ability to absorb key protective skills.

Lessons learned:

  • Parental and teacher engagement: While the program improved children’s knowledge, long-term engagement with teachers, caregivers and other duty-bearers is necessary to ensure that holistic safeguarding is being achieved at home, at school, and at a community level.
  • Scalability: The program demonstrated effectiveness but would require greater investment and adaptation to be implemented at a scale.
  • Combining online material with in-person teaching: Children learned more when teachers implemented blended learning strategies in the classroom.
  • Practice-based knowledge and lived expertise: Input from deaf children, parents, and practitioners showed that interactive, visual play was essential for learning, leading to the design of simple, sign-language-based games that children could understand and use. 
6

Sources and contact

[1] Jones, et. al. 2012. Prevalence and risk of violence against children with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60692-8

[2] Sullivan, et. al. 1987. Sexual abuse of deaf youth. American Annals of the Deaf. 132 (4). 256-262. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/385602

[3] Thomas, E. (2022). “I feel strong & powerful”: Evaluation of DeafKidz Defenders pilot. DeafKidz International. 

[4] DeafKidz International. (2023). Report of the trustees and financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2023. Chariot House Limited. 

Special thanks to DeafKidz International for co-developing this case study. For those interested in learning more, you can get in touch with DeafKidz International CEO Debra Clelland at [email protected].

Last updated: 09 February 2026